Rajkumar Santoshi on Family, moral censorship and his decision to put aside Saamna to make a
comedy next. By Subhash K. Jha
Q: Your new film Family has opened to an unenthusiastic response.
A: Normally, once I finish post-production work I move on to my next. In fact, I've been out of the country
hunting locations for my next film — a comedy.
Q: Family is very original on the idea level?
A: I don't see it as an actioner. I see it as emotional family film. When Shaktiman (who wrote Gadar)
came to me with the idea, I really liked it. My co-writer Sridhar Raghavan and I reworked more than 80
per cent of the original story.
We didn't want it to be a normal vendetta film. At the core, the
theme is almost mythological. Mr Bachchan's downfall is like that of Karna in the Mahabharat who
died of his own karma. That's what we tried to show in Family. If you don't have a family to fall back
on, you've nothing.
Q: How was it directing Mr Bachchan for the second time after Khakee?
A: I'm a very big fan of Mr Bachchan right from my college days. I wrote both Khakee and Family with
Sridhar only to showcase his talent. After Khakee I wanted to bring out another dimension in Mr
Bachchan's acting. The first thing we did was to place him on the opposite side of the law. When I
arrived at the script of Family I knew this would give me a chance to present him in a totally different
light.
Mr Bachchan plays a man that the audience simply hates. Look at how he gets
Akshay Kumar's character killed with such arrogance, ruthlessness and indifference. But finally we
cry for the gangster. That graph from loathsome to sympathetic could've only been carried off by
Amitji.
Q: Do you think we want to see him in a negative role especially after his illness?
A: Why not? I never thought of this when casting him. He's an actor, and an outstanding one at that. I
don't think we filmmakers should mix up his personal life with what he does onscreen. If we do we will
end up like waiters at a hotel, taking orders from the box-office on which section of the audience likes
what. In any case, Mr Bachchan isn't all black in Family. We see his human side at the same
time.
Q: How did his illness affect your film?
A: Only to the extent that we were supposed to release the film on December 23. We had to
postpone it by a couple of weeks. That apart, Family showcases his calibre to the optimum. I mean,
look at his range and energy. The plot rests completely on his shoulder right from the start to end.
Q: Do you think you've evolved as a director?
A: Nowadays I get very angry when I pick up the newspaper and see what's happening around us. I'd
say my cinema has become more aware of our surroundings. The battles are more socio-politically
widened now than in my earlier films.
Q: Your next is a politically charged parable, Saamna?
A: I'm no longer doing Saamna now. That was a very controversial subject on the marriage of religion
and politics. Now I'm doing a comedy called Ladies & Gentlemen. After that I'm doing a musical set
in London called London Dreams with Salman Khan and Ajay Devgan one after another.
Q: Who will star in Ladies & Gentleman?
A: We haven't decided. The comedy is an intimate one, with not too many characters, and my first
comedy after Andaz Apna Apna. It was on the anvil for some time. I was wondering when would be
the right time for it. The film is very modern and glamorous and almost futuristic in terms of content
and mood. It's almost like a 2009 film.
Q: Are you in favour of smoking?
A: Not at all! I don't smoke. I don't want my children or anyone's children to smoke. But the cigar
gave a certain attitude of style and arrogance to Amitji's character. If cigarettes can be sold in the
market with a statutory warning, then I don't mind putting a similar warning on my
hoardings.
Unfortunately, they put that photograph of Amitji with a cigar on the hoardings. I
wasn't aware of the repercussions. The marketing people should have been more cautious.
Q: But people have objections to Mr Bachchan smoking.
A: That's really disturbing. He's an actor, yaar! Should he only play characters like Gautam Buddha
and Mahatma Gandhi? The moralists must change their attitude. Otherwise we'll take our cinema
back by so many years. If he's playing a gangster he'll have to carry a pistol. That doesn't mean
Amitabh Bachchan is carrying a weapon.
Q: Does this moral censorship daunt you?
A: Absolutely. Every filmmaker feels suffocated. We're heading towards a cinema of prudery. Let the
audience decide what it wants to do. Aap aisa nahin kar sakte hain. Don't underestimate the
audience. I'll continue to make the films I believe in.
Q: But you did postpone Saamna?
A: Well...tomorrow anyone from any small town can get up and file a case stopping my film. I've gone
through this during Lajja. It's very dangerous. I make expensive films. I can't afford to falter. I'd never
do anything that would jeopardise a project.
Q: In Family I feel you're burdened by the task of projecting the producer's son?
A: Not to a large extent. But, yes, the songs were forced in for Aryeman. But I gave him no romantic
angle.
It is a cinema of prudery now: Rajkumar Santoshi
Monday, January 23, 2006 13:30 IST