Directed by Vidhu Vinod Chopra
Rating: ** ½
Can form provide contentment? Can form, no matter how glorious, be a substitute for content?
In Eklavya lack of content isn't a problem. It's the dense tense and dark nature of the content that proves to be a dismaying impediment to enjoying the vast virility of Vidhu Chopra's storytelling.
How do we define the plot of Eklavya? Partly borrowing the dark indefinable pathos of Shakespeare's tragedy, partly reverting to the palatial pathos of the Mughal empire where patricide frequently collided with complex Oedipal equations, Eklavya takes us into a territory totally unexplored and absolutely designed to create an ethos of infinite resonances.
Eklavya is a film of many virtues. Screenwriter Abhijat Joshi and Vinod Chopra aim for that sense of heightened tragedy that underlines the cinema of Kurosawa and the music of Mozart.
The quality of the sound design (Biswajit Chatterjee), background score (Shantanu Moitra) and cinematography (N. Natarajan Subramaniam) elevates the tragic and bizarre tale of a dysfunctional royal family to heights of lyricism.

Some stories are better left unsaid. Eklavya, tragically, seems to belong to that rare genre of stories that lose their relevance in their rendering. The characters, all ruefully rooted to a decadent and dying aristocracy are either neurotic, manic or self-destructive.

Unwittingly they often end up looking preposterous in their selfconscious postures of assumed dignity.
In their inability to see beyond their own hefty hunger for self-assertion the characters often end up mimicking rather than replicating the Shakespearean tragedy.
Vinod Chopra's is undoubtedly a master craftsman. At times he becomes selfindulgent in his visual panache. The sequence where Eklavya slaughters Jimmy Shergil (aiming to be lean and mean) as he watches, ahem ahem, Vinod Chopra's Parinda and the recurrent pigeons-leitmotif, are classic Chopra embellishments best left behind in a film that in many ways, crosses the boundaries of mainstream conventions.
Indeed, if Vishal Bhardwaj's Omkara was more Ram Gopal Varma than Shakespeare, Eklavya is more Virginia Woolf than Shakespeare.
Chopra is brilliant at capturing neurosis through the lens of the camera. At times he makes room for tenderness. Watch Mr Bachchan's expression of tender nostalgia as Vidya Balan sings the ancestral lullabye. You often see the characters framed frantically in 'show'-motion....

God knows, Chopra spares no efforts to penetrate the steely wily hearts of these bereft souls. Rajasthan is captured in tell-tale silhouettes as the stately royal guard Eklavya (Bachchan) forms a fertile bond with a family of doomed aristocrats.
The narration begins as a mother-son story and builds with magical volition, into a father-son tale of clenched trauma. By the time the Royal Guard Eklavya points a gun at his own heir-apparent, we are left looking at a family that doesn't need redemption. It just needs to be buried in the slinky sand dunes of time.

Eklavya is a chronicle of defeat. People who belong to no specific time zone seem to be manoeuvering their lives beyond the rhythms of the rationale.
There's poetry in the soul of Eklavya. But the lines do not cohere or represent any significant symbiosis of form and content. With its unforgettable images of elemental forces, Eklavya is a film that was probably as hard to make as it is to profile and define.
At the end it remains an honorable failure, lifted to distinction by Mr Bachchan's stately performance.