There are some things that are meant to be. Like Aishwarya Rai's global impact, which currently reverberates from Cannes to Los Angeles.
When Rai stood up at Cannes to declare the festival open she did Indian cinema proud. She is, after all, the true face of Indian womanhood... delicate, feminine, beautiful, ethereal and very, very Indian.
In contrast, Mallika Sherawat with her brassy upfront image and strident self- proclamations looks like a revved-up advertisement for a silicone implant. Many of her colleagues from the film industry are appalled at her body-display in Cannes.
One leading actress, not known to comment on anyone unless provoked, was appalled: "What was the need for her to wear, or not wear, clothes that left nothing, and everything, to the imagination? The hot-bod image may have men panting for her back home. But over there in Cannes Mallika represented India and Indian cinema. The foreigners are hardly going to be bowled over by a woman's sharp cleavage content. You need much more substance to grab attention at a jamboree like Cannes."
But Mallika has said at Cannes that she represents Jackie Chan's "The Myth" (in which she has a starring and certainly not sari-ing role) and not Indian cinema at Cannes. She has also sent back her reactions to Cannes in a letter where she expresses her delight at being able to explore "unexplored anthropological territory".
Her powers of expressions in the English language seem to have improved dramatically. But her image as the consummate Indian actress seems to have gone for a toss in Cannes.
There's little to endear Mallika abroad to those who are curious about Indian cinema. Mallika represents the pseudo-cosmopolitan face of Bollywood. Her appeal is restricted to pre-pubescent students and single men who consider cinema a source of vicarious pleasure.
The face of Indian cinema is the face of Indian grace and dignity -- Hema Malini, Sridevi, Madhuri Dixit, Aishwarya Rai. These are the dream girls of Hindi cinema.
The overall impact of Mallika's bejewelled body exhibition in Cannes was nil. Mallika's presence didn't further
the cause of Indian cinema in the West. It wasn't meant to. Post Mallika's bouncing pirouette at Cannes the
question we all need to ask ourselves is... what exactly is the bare-all-dare-all brigade trying to sell in faraway
lands where Indian cinema still epitomises exotica?We can't replace curry-exotica with dime store erotica and expect foreigners to respect our cinema more. We need to be more careful in selecting the people who represent us at international film festivals.
We cannot sell our cinema to the West by exporting beach-blonde bombshells. We need to get proud of the way we are. And we need to market Indian cinema accordingly.
