In his application filed through counsel Manisha Singhal, Sanjay said he was the natural guardian of Samaira and as such he was responsible for and entitled to take all decisions relating to the minor in her interest.
Sanjay, who has filed a writ petition seeking to restrain Karisma from going abroad along with Samaira and cancellation of the minor's passport issued by Regional Passport Office (RPO), Mumbai, submitted that it would be in the interest of justice to add Samaira as a co-petitioner/co-applicant in these proceedings and appoint him as her next friend.
Sanjay's application was likely to be taken up on August 26 when his writ petition would come up for hearing.
Interestingly, it was Karisma whose counsel had on the last date wondered how the petitioner was seeking cancellation of Samaira's passport without impleading her as a party to the case.
Contending that "custody of the child does not ipso facto amount to guardianship", Sanjay said while Karisma may be in the actual physical custody of the child by unilaterally keeping the minor away from her rightful home, "she (Karisma) is not the sole guardian of our daughter."
Claiming to be the natural guardian of Samaira, Sanjay said only he could defend the best interest of the child.
Sunjay, too, accused Karisma of leaving him. "I state the fact that the respondent (Karisma) in a pre-planned manner went for the delivery of our first child to her mother's place and refused to return. She is using Samaira to cause emotional trauma to me and deprive me, as well as our daughter, of love and care," Sunjay claimed.
According to him, he visited the metropolis just to meet his wife and daughter. Through their marriage, he claimed to have taken care of Karisma's expenses, including credit card payments, telephone bills, travel expenses within India and abroad, restaurant and night club bills.
Sunjay also claims to have paid film producers whom Karisma owed money.
"In fact, I continue to pay her credit card and phone bills,"he stated. Copies of credit card statements have been annexed along with the rejoinder.
He said if Karisma continues to have a grievance with regard to lack of financial contribution on his part, he was willing to reimburse the expenses she incured on their daughter.
"However, if she expects me to run her mother's house while I am running the expenses of our matrimonial house, the same is totally unjustifiable," Sunjay said.
Sanjay also submitted a certificate from a Delhi-based paediatrician who advised against the five-month-old baby's travel to US as it would expose the baby to unnecessary hazards of infection as result of the travel in a confined aircraft cabin for at least 24 hours each way.
It could also result into possible barotrauma to the ears from air travel, jet lag and interruption of routine, the certificate issued by the doctor said.
In her affidavit in response to Sanjay's petition, Karisma had on August 20 said that she was deserted by her ‘disgruntled' husband Sanjay Kapur who dragged her to court in a ‘crude attempt' to seek redress of their matrimonial issues by using their five-month-old daughter Samaira as a ‘pawn'.
The actress said Sanjay constructively deserted her and that he was aware why she was "compelled to reside in Mumbai".
Seeking dismissal of Sanjay's petition on the ground of lack of jurisdiction as the passport was issued by RPO, Mumbai, Karisma submitted that the contours of the petition left no doubt that it was nothing but a ‘crude attempt' to urge and seek redress of matrimonial issues of a disgruntled husband and Karisma by using the minor as a pawn.
Karisma alleged, "barring a few occasional visits to meet their daughter, the petitioner has played no part in the upbringing and welfare of the minor child even today.
"Particularly, the petitioner (Sanjay) has made no financial contribution to the upkeep of the child and the pre-natal, delivery and post-natal care of the mother," she submitted in her affidavit filed through Karanjawala and Co.
Sanjay was supposed to file his rejoinder to Karisma's affidavit today.